People management FAQs  /  What AI discrimination rules must HR follow in IL, CO, and TX?

What AI discrimination rules must HR follow in IL, CO, and TX?

Operations | May 26, 2026 by TalentHR, 2 min read

Three states have AI-in-employment laws taking effect in 2026, each with a different approach. Illinois focuses on notice and disclosure. Colorado requires impact assessments and public reporting, but they are currently under active revision. Texas prohibits only intentional discrimination and imposes few affirmative obligations on private employers. 

Federal laws (Title VII and the ADA) still apply, as the EEOC makes clear.

Side-by-side comparison

  • Illinois HB 3773 (January 1, 2026): disparate-impact standard. Notice to employees required with the tool name, data, and purpose, annually, and in job postings. Private right of action. Penalties are actual damages, civil penalties, and attorneys' fees, with no cap. Applies to employers with one or more Illinois employees.
  • Colorado SB 24-205 (June 30, 2026, under revision): algorithmic-discrimination reasonable-care standard. Notice required before consequential decisions, with appeal rights. Annual impact assessment is retained for three years. Public website statement. AG enforcement only. Penalties up to $20,000 per violation per affected person. Safe harbor via NIST AI RMF. A March 2026 working group released a framework that may inform replacement legislation in 2026; SB 24-205 remains the current law on the books.
  • Texas HB 149 / TRAIGA (January 1, 2026): intentional discrimination only. No notice, assessment, or disclosure required for private employers. AG enforcement only. Penalties $10,000 to $12,000 per general violation; $80,000 to $200,000 per violation for "unacceptable uses" such as social scoring or biometric categorization. Safe harbor via NIST AI RMF.

As per the NCSL, Illinois is the highest-risk jurisdiction because of the private right of action. A Colorado AI working group has released a framework that may inform replacement legislation, but SB 24-205 remains in force pending any new bill. Texas is the lightest for private employers.

What HR teams typically do now

HR teams regularly considering ideas on minimizing AI bias risk in recruiting typically go through these steps for these states specifically:

  • Illinois: add AI disclosure language to job postings and handbooks, set annual notice schedules, and retain notices for four years
  • Colorado: if the law proceeds as enacted, complete an impact assessment before June 30 and publish a website statement
  • Texas: document that AI tools are not used to intentionally discriminate

Disclaimer:

This article informs, not advises. Colorado's law is still in flux, so check the current rules before you rely on them.

TL;DR

  • Illinois (January 2026): AI notice required in postings and to employees, with a private right of action.
  • Colorado (June 2026): annual impact assessments, public disclosure, and AG reporting. Replacement legislation has been proposed but not enacted.
  • Texas (January 2026): intentional AI discrimination prohibited. No notice, assessments, or disclosure for private employers.

Start TalentHR free -
Unlock advanced features for $2/user

Sign up for a free account with no time limits